Registrace nového uživatele     Návod     Kluby     Archív  Lopuchu     Lopuch.cz  

Já Vánoce juchuchu
oslavím na Lopuchu!

Lopuch.cz

Jméno:
Heslo:
Podpora LCD:
 
Archiv klubu Zbraně hromadného ničení [ŽP: 8 týdnů] (kategorie Věda a Technika) moderuje Zeta leader.

Tento klub je určen k diskusi o zbraních hromadného ničení (všech třech typech)- jejich účincích a typech. Byl bych rád, kdyby se tu vedla alespoň trochu seriózní diskuse (jak jsem si povšiml, zde na Lopuchu je spousta lidí, jejichž informovanost o zbraních hromadného ničení je téměř minimální, takže bych byl nerad, kdyby se tu objevovali jedinci s výkřiky o konci světa).
Linky:
URL link Popis
Nuclear Effects Group [eng] Exoatmosférické prejavy
The Nuclear Weapon Archive [eng] Hlavný zdroj informácií
Nuclear Explosions Database Geoscience Australia 1945-2004 [eng] Datábaza testov
Internet Archive on "atomic" keyword [eng] US testy a propaganda
Фотографии ядерных взрывов [ru] Ядерное оружие
Ядерные испытания СССР[ru] Организация ядерных испытаний СССР
Nuclear Forces Guide [eng] (FAS)
  Nastavení klubu     Nastavení práv     Homepage     Anketa     Přítomní     Oblíbené     Lopuch     Kategorie  
autor: 
text: 
vyplnit a 
Help
   
[ 2111 ] <Novější  <<<Nejnovější  Nejstarší>>>  Starší>  
mashe 22.11.2004 22:45  561
vlada ... mozna ... ale jak rekl zeta ... ani nepodcenovat ...
vlada 22.11.2004 22:00  560
Ja bych je kazdopadne neprecenoval.
zeta_leader Zeta leader There are two of you, captain - don't you see? 19.11.2004 20:31  559
nekro: Amici si zmrdi (statisticky).Su dobry v numerike ale nikoliv v analytike.
notor:Ma to byt nieco nove, nie T-M.
All: Rusov by som nepodcenoval.
winner 19.11.2004 11:08  558
Přesně tak. Taky jsem zvědav, jak to dopadne s tím jejich satelitním nav. systémem...
nekromancer 19.11.2004 10:55  557
WinnerTaky si myslim že ruskej obrannej systém je bublina. Kdyby skutečně fungoval, už by to hlásili do světa zlatejma troubama.
winner 19.11.2004 10:53  556
nekromancerRuský obranný systém bych chtěl vidět. Spíš se ho bojím. S tím, jak chátrá, se zvyšuje riziko falešného polachu. Takže abychom se jednoho dne nedočkali spálené Číny a Rusko jenom proto, že těchnik viděl odlesky slunce na mracích a počítač vše špatně vyhodnitil ;-))
nekromancer 19.11.2004 10:44  555
Mňo, formulace že Rusové mají střelu, kterou Američani nedokážou sestřelit, přičemž jsou chráněni fungujícím obranným systémem, je sice hrozně hezká, ovšem je to blábol. Když takto zodolněnou střelu dokázali vyvinout Rusové, co bránilo v jejím vývoji Američanům?
winner 19.11.2004 10:38  554
Putin si zase zvyšuje popularitu, to je k pláči...
notorius Notorius 19.11.2004 10:21  553
Proč s tím dělá Putin takový humbuk, vždyť už Topol-M pár let ve výzbroji mají, ne?
winner 18.11.2004 20:49  552
Vidím, že Rusové ví, co dělat s miliardami, které dostávají za ropu ;-)

Kdyby rusko jednu prodalo Íránu, myslím, že by amíci začali přehodnocovat svoje plány pro blízký východ ;-)
zeta_leader Zeta leader There are two of you, captain - don't you see? 18.11.2004 20:16  551
Topol M? Nazval by som ju USA killer ;)
------------------------------------------
The Russian SS-27, or Topol-M, is an intercontinental-range, ground-based, solid propellant ballistic missile. It represents the pinnacle of ballistic missile technology, incorporating modern fuel and warhead designs, as well as being capable of being launched from both missile silos and Transporter-Erector-Launcher (TEL) vehicles. Current Russian accounts stress that the SS-27 is invulnerable to any modern anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defenses. Yuriy Solomonov, director of the Moscow Institute of Heat Technology and designer-general of the Topol family of missiles, has stated that the SS-27 will be the foundation of the Russian strategic nuclear arsenal by 2015.

The SS-27 is currently portrayed by Russian accounts as being immune to any ABM defense the United States can put into being. The missile is capable of making evasive maneuvers as it approaches its target, enabling it to evade any terminal phase interceptors. It almost certainly also carries countermeasures and decoys to decrease the chances of a successful targeting. The missile is shielded against radiation, electromagnetic interference and physical disturbance; previous missiles could be disabled by detonating a nuclear warhead within ten kilometers. This vulnerability is the basis behind the use of nuclear ground-based and orbital interceptors, to detonate or damage the missile before it reaches its target. However, the SS-27 is designed to be able to withstand nuclear blasts closer than 500 m, a difficult interception when combined with the terminal phase speed and maneuverability. While the boost phase is the most vulnerable time for the SS-27, it remains protected. Hidden safely within missile silos and mobile launchers, a successful boost-phase interceptor would have to be fired from near or within Russian borders or from space. And the SS-27 is also designed to survive a strike from any laser technology available, rendering any current space-based laser useless. The missile highlights the need for considerably more research into missile defenses, as the United States is currently defenseless while Russia is protected by a functional defense system.

The SS-27 can currently strike any target within the continental United States. The deployment from hardened silos and hidden TEL vehicles makes it nearly impossible to successfully prevent launch and current ABM technology is insufficient to prevent its successful impact. As a solid propellant design, it can be maintained on alert for prolonged periods of time and can launch within minutes of being given the order. Its confirmed single 550 kT warhead is sufficient for the depopulation of cities, which combined with its survivability, makes it an ideal retaliatory weapon. The SS-27 enables Russia to guarantee a successful nuclear response.

The SS-27 also has considerable utility as a first strike weapon. A successful first strike hinges upon the destruction of the enemy nuclear force, and the SS-27 should be capable of that task. Though its reported accuracy is insufficient for this, current guidance technology could easily be used to develop this capacity. The accuracy of 350 m CEP reported is strangely low given previous US and Russian missile designs with considerably higher accuracy. With a higher accuracy, the single warhead load would be easily sufficient to destroy a missile silo, but the placement of Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs) would allow for the destruction of entire missile groups. The SS-27 design is easily compatible for MIRV warheads, though it must sacrifice its ability to penetrate ABM defense systems. Solomonov has stated openly that the TEL launched SS-27 will carry four to six warheads along with decoys, which implies the same capability for the silo-launched version.

The SS-27 has a range of 10,500 km (6524 miles) and is reported to typically be equipped with a 550 kT yield nuclear warhead. Unconfirmed reports suggest a yield of 1 MT has been achieved, as well as the placement of up to six MIRV warheads. These enhancements likely come at the cost of reducing the shielding around the warhead and removing the decoys, rendering the missile vulnerable to ABM defenses. It uses a Post-Boost Vehicle (PBV) system to deploy its warhead(s) using a digital inertial navigation system with a GLOSNASS (equivalent to Global Position Satellite) receiver. This achieves a reported accuracy of 350 m CEP, but this accuracy is lower than is reasonable to believe, given modern guidance systems and previous US and Russian missiles. It has a launch weight of 47,200 kg with a length of 21.9 m and a maximum width of 1.9 m. It uses a three-stage solid propellant engine.
winner 18.11.2004 20:05  550
Co to k čertu je Topol-M?
winner 18.11.2004 09:32  549
Všechno jde, když se chce.
zeta_leader Zeta leader There are two of you, captain - don't you see? 18.11.2004 09:22  548
Su iste staty ktore z OSN nejde vyhodit ;)
winner 18.11.2004 01:00  547
No, každopádně navrhuji Rusko za tuto hrozbu vyhodit z OSN a zakázat dovozy jeho ropy ;-))) Pak by se uvidělo, jestli budou nějaké nové rakety, nebo nebudou ;-)

[ 2111 ] <Novější  <<<Nejnovější  Nejstarší>>>  Starší>  

(c) 2001-2011 Lopuch.cz   
Kontakt